
Baghdad, Iraq – Iraq is on the cusp of a profound transformation, moving towards an era defined by greater national sovereignty as both the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) and a significant portion of the U.S. military presence prepare for their final departure. This pivotal shift signals Baghdad's determined effort to shed its post-conflict international oversight and assert full control over its destiny, marking a new chapter fraught with both promise and inherent challenges for the nation's security and stability.
After more than two decades, the United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq (UNAMI) is set to conclude its operations by December 31, 2025. Established in 2003 following the U.S.-led invasion, UNAMI's mandate was to support Iraq's political transition, promote dialogue, assist in elections, and contribute to security sector reform. The decision to terminate the mission came at the explicit request of the Iraqi government, which formally communicated its desire for UNAMI's departure to the UN Secretary-General in May 2024.
Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia al-Sudani and other officials have articulated that the nation has completed its political building process and no longer requires a political mission of UNAMI's scope. This move reflects Iraq's aspiration for normalcy and its aim to reduce dependence on international assistance, signaling a belief in its own capacity to manage internal and external affairs. In response to Baghdad's request, the UN Security Council approved a final 19-month extension for UNAMI until the end of 2025, facilitating an "orderly and safe" drawdown and transition of responsibilities. While UNAMI's political and advisory role will cease, 23 other specialized UN agencies focused on development, humanitarian aid, human rights, and climate resilience are expected to continue their work in Iraq. UNAMI head Mohamed Al Hassan emphasized that the mission's departure "does not mark an end to the Iraq-UN partnership," but rather "represents the start of a new chapter rooted in Iraq's leadership of its own future."
Parallel to the UN's withdrawal, the U.S. military presence in Iraq is undergoing a significant, long-planned reduction, transitioning away from a direct combat role towards an "enduring bilateral security partnership." The United States first withdrew its troops in 2011, only to return in 2014 at the request of the Iraqi government to combat the rise of the Islamic State (ISIS). As of March 2023, approximately 2,500 U.S. troops remained in Iraq, primarily in advisory and assistance capacities.
In September 2024, the U.S. and Iraqi governments, under the Biden administration, formalized a plan to wind down the military mission of the U.S.-led coalition. This agreement outlines a phased withdrawal, with hundreds of U.S. troops expected to depart by September 2025, and the remaining forces significantly reduced or withdrawn by January 2027. Many of the remaining U.S. troops are anticipated to consolidate their presence in the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Region, particularly at bases in Erbil. This strategic repositioning aims to continue providing training, intelligence, and air support to Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) for ongoing counter-ISIS operations, without a direct combat mission.
Iraqi Prime Minister Al-Sudani has been vocal about his government's stance, asserting in August 2023 that Iraq no longer requires foreign combat units to fight ISIS and is working towards ending the international coalition's presence. This push for withdrawal is driven by a desire to restore full national sovereignty and manage its own security independently. However, the accelerated pace of these withdrawals has been influenced by increased attacks on U.S. forces by Iran-backed militias, particularly since October 2023, which have prompted Iraqi calls for a clear timetable for foreign troop departure.
The dual departure of UNAMI and the reduction of U.S. troops underscore Iraq's resolute push for full sovereignty. Iraqi officials frequently highlight the increased capabilities of the Iraqi Security Forces (ISF), contending they are fully capable of defending the country and containing terrorist threats without the need for foreign combat troops. This perceived self-reliance forms the bedrock of Baghdad's new posture on the international stage.
However, the path to unencumbered sovereignty is paved with significant internal challenges. The experience of the 2011 U.S. withdrawal, which preceded the rise of ISIS, serves as a stark reminder of the potential for a security vacuum. Despite the military defeat of ISIS in 2017, sleeper cells remain active, particularly in disputed territories, posing a persistent threat that requires robust and sustained counter-terrorism efforts. Moreover, Iraq grapples with profound internal political divisions, ongoing power struggles, and the pervasive influence of various Iran-backed militias that sometimes operate outside state control. These factors complicate Baghdad's ability to exert undisputed authority across its territory and risk undermining its hard-won stability. Economically, some experts warn that the removal of U.S. protections could lead to financial pressure and isolation, emphasizing the need for comprehensive economic and political reforms to ensure long-term stability and growth.
The evolving international presence in Iraq holds significant implications for regional dynamics. A reduced U.S. military footprint could be perceived as a decline in American influence, a development that powers like China and Russia would likely welcome. Conversely, it also raises concerns about the potential for Iran to further expand its political and militia networks within Iraq, filling any void left by Western forces.
Interestingly, the shifting geopolitical landscape, particularly the fall of the Assad regime in Syria, has prompted some Iran-allied factions within Iraq to reconsider their aggressive calls for an immediate U.S. withdrawal, signaling a complex and fluid regional environment. The consolidation of remaining U.S. troops in the Kurdistan Region, while providing a stable operational base, also introduces a delicate balance, potentially enhancing the Kurdistan Regional Government's (KRG) strategic influence but also making the region a potential target for Iranian retaliatory actions. Escalating hostilities between regional powers, such as the conflict between Israel and Iran, directly impact Iraq's stability, often leading to violations of Iraqi airspace and attacks on its infrastructure. Iraq must carefully navigate these complex regional tensions to safeguard its newfound sovereignty and prevent becoming a battleground for proxy conflicts.
Iraq stands at a crucial juncture, navigating the complex transition from a period of extensive international intervention to one of self-determination. The planned conclusion of the UNAMI mission and the phased withdrawal of U.S. combat forces underscore Iraq's determined pursuit of full sovereignty and its confidence in its own institutions. This transition, while celebrated as a milestone in national independence, also presents substantial challenges related to internal security, political cohesion, economic stability, and regional geopolitical pressures. The coming years will be critical in determining whether Iraq can effectively harness its newfound autonomy to build a secure, stable, and prosperous future, firmly rooted in its own leadership.

DAMASCUS, Syria – One year after the dramatic fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime, Syria stands at a precarious crossroads, grappling with the immense task of rebuilding a nation shattered by 13 years of civil war. The celebratory cries that accompanied the ousting of the long-ruling Baath Party on December 8, 2024, have given way to the complex realities of political transition, economic hardship, and persistent security threats

BUDAPEST, Hungary – Prime Minister Viktor Orbán of Hungary has meticulously constructed a durable political apparatus, consistently securing electoral victories and extending his party Fidesz's dominant influence over the nation. His strategy hinges on a calculated blend of generous financial incentives aimed at key demographics and aggressive smear campaigns that effectively neutralize political opposition and external critics

The United States has seen significant shifts in its immigration landscape under Donald Trump's presidential administrations, marked by a series of executive actions designed to curtail both legal and unauthorized entry. These measures, often implemented with immediate effect, have sparked widespread debate, faced legal challenges, and left a profound impact on immigrant communities, families, and various sectors of the American economy