
Damascus, Syria — As Syria navigates its most significant political upheaval in over a decade with the recent fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, the nation finds itself simultaneously grappling with an unprecedented surge of fake news and coordinated disinformation campaigns. The departure of Assad on December 8, following the "Deterrence of Aggression" military operation launched by opposition factions led by Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham on November 27, has opened a new, yet fragile, chapter for Syria. This rapid power shift has coincided with a deluge of misleading information, exploiting the fluid situation and threatening to further destabilize a society already scarred by years of conflict.
The abrupt collapse of the Assad regime and the subsequent transition to a new administration under Ahmad al-Sharaa have ushered in a period of profound uncertainty and cautious optimism. For many Syrians, the end of Assad's rule has brought a new openness, particularly in the media landscape, which had long been tightly controlled. However, this newfound freedom has also created fertile ground for the rapid spread of unsubstantiated rumors and outright fabrications. The swift pace of events has even led some reputable media organizations and journalists to inadvertently circulate false information, underscoring the challenge of verification in such a volatile environment. The initial days following Assad's flight were marked by considerable confusion as rebel groups entered Damascus, and a torrent of both genuine and deceptive information inundated the public sphere.
The scale and sophistication of the misinformation campaigns are extensive, leveraging various digital platforms to sow discord and manipulate public opinion. A recent investigation by BBC Arabic's fact-checking team revealed that since December 8, over 400,000 posts on X (formerly Twitter) were linked to disinformation and hate speech concerning Syria's new administration. Alarmingly, at least 50,000 of these posts contained false or unreliable information, with 60% originating from accounts outside Syria, specifically from countries like Iraq, Yemen, Lebanon, and Iran.
The tactics employed in these campaigns are varied and insidious. They include the recycling of old videos depicting "sectarian strife," falsely presented as current events, and statements taken out of context to incite animosity, particularly against Christian communities. Scenes of heavy weaponry clashes from other countries have been deceptively attributed to Syria, creating a distorted reality. Artificial intelligence has also been weaponized, generating fake images that spread rapidly online, alongside images from unrelated historical events, such as the Vietnam War, falsely portrayed as current Syrian scenes. Fabricated stories of fictitious detainees further contribute to the climate of distrust.
Sectarian divisions are a primary target of these disinformation efforts. More than 100,000 posts, many traced to Saudi Arabian and Turkish accounts, have propagated hate speech and incitement against Alawis, labeling them as "infidels" and "criminals." A particularly dangerous example was a fake recording claiming to feature a Druze religious leader, Sheikh Marwan Kiwan, insulting the Prophet Muhammad. Both Kiwan and the Syrian defense ministry swiftly debunked the recording, identifying it as a deliberate attempt to ignite sectarian conflict.
The impact of this pervasive misinformation is not confined to the digital realm; it has tangible, often devastating, real-world consequences. The fake recording targeting the Druze community, for instance, directly led to deadly clashes between pro-government fighters and local Druze gunmen south of Damascus, resulting in dozens of fatalities. Beyond direct violence, rumors circulating on platforms like WhatsApp have triggered widespread panic. One such instance involved a false report of tanks encircling a city, causing residents to flee and shopkeepers to close their businesses, only for security forces to discover that a transport truck briefly carrying a tank on a highway had been misinterpreted.
Such incidents highlight how misinformation can fuel existing tensions and instability in an already fractured society. Many Syrians describe themselves as "hostage to rumors," with the country remaining "on edge." The bloody events that followed Assad's fall have been significantly "fueled or inflated" by the constant barrage of misleading narratives. The coordinated nature of some of these online manipulations, both against and in support of the new administration, suggests a strategic effort to shape the political landscape.
In response to this digital onslaught, a dedicated community of fact-checkers and grassroots activists has emerged, working tirelessly to verify information and debunk false narratives. Organizations like Verify-Sy, described as one of the largest fact-checking platforms in the country, and Takad, a nationwide volunteer organization, are at the forefront of these efforts. Takad, which operated secretly under the Assad government, now openly works to counter misinformation, with volunteers like Rafi Brazi spending their days analyzing and verifying news from Syria circulating on social media.
These groups face immense challenges, as the sheer volume of misinformation often outpaces their capacity to debunk it. They emphasize that much of the false information originates from social media outlets and is further amplified by fake accounts or pages designed to destabilize the situation and manipulate public opinion. The need for media literacy education and official media watchdogs is increasingly recognized as crucial in empowering Syrians to discern truth from fiction. Even as the new Syrian president reportedly seeks to enshrine a free media in the constitutional declaration, the battle against disinformation remains a critical priority.
The proliferation of fake news during Syria's power shift underscores a critical challenge for the war-torn nation. While the opening of media space offers new avenues for expression, it simultaneously exposes the populace to unprecedented levels of manipulation. The coordinated efforts to spread disinformation, often with external origins and sectarian motives, threaten to undermine the fragile stability of the transitional period. As Syria attempts to forge a new path, the ability of its citizens to access and critically evaluate accurate information will be paramount to building a resilient and informed society. The fight for truth online is as vital as any political or military struggle in shaping the nation's future.

WASHINGTON D.C. – Humanity now stands at a precipice, with the symbolic Doomsday Clock ticking closer to midnight than ever before at a mere 85 seconds, a stark warning amplified by the imminent expiration of the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) between the United States and Russia. This week, the last remaining bilateral nuclear arms control agreement formally limiting the world's two largest nuclear arsenals ceased to be, heralding an era of unprecedented uncertainty and raising global anxieties about an unconstrained nuclear arms race.
The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, responsible for setting the iconic clock, recently advanced its hands by four seconds to 85 seconds to midnight on January 27, 2026, citing an "unprecedented surge in nuclear instability" alongside escalating climate change and the rapid, unchecked development of artificial intelligence

In an era defined by rapid digital dissemination, the recycling of video content for political ends has emerged as a formidable challenge to informed public discourse. From outdated footage presented as current events to AI-generated simulations blurring the lines of reality, political actors increasingly leverage visual media to sway public opinion, manufacturing narratives that can undermine trust in institutions and distort democratic processes

DAVOS, Switzerland – In recent addresses to the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, former President Donald Trump has consistently drawn attention for a series of statements that have subsequently undergone rigorous fact-checking. His appearances at the exclusive gathering of global leaders and business magnates have served as platforms for reiterating familiar claims and introducing new assertions, many of which have been challenged by independent analyses